CityKin finds another great post from an out-of-town visitor to Cincinnati, this time from Indianapolis (see previous post from an MSP resident).
I'll paraphrase from the blog post a little bit to forge a message that I like.
What is so great about Cincinnati? Let's list some of the things:One interesting thing is that the author seemed to have made it out the first-and-second suburbs during his visit. He includes some lovely pictures of the likes of downtown Montgomery, Hamilton, and Lebanon. I've always thought that these old town centers - not in the city, but an inseparable part of the metro - were great assets to the region as a whole, and I think this is the first time I've read thoughts along the same lines.Yet, I'm always befuddled as well as I puzzle a great conundrum: if Cincinnati is so great, how come it isn't the San Francisco of the Midwest instead of a typical, modestly stagnated Midwestern city?
- The fabulous geography.
- Spectacular, dense urban neighborhoods with wonderful architecture.
- Innovative new architecture.
- The patchwork quilt of towns.
- Top notch cultural institutions.
- Many major corporate headquarters.
- A genuine regional culture.
- Major regional assets (e.g. Kings Island, CVG)
It just goes to show that what I said in my pecha kucha presentation was true: cities are about people, not just buildings. All the great geography, architecture, etc. in the world isn't a sufficient condition to create a thriving, dynamic city.
The blog's 21 (at this time) comments debate a number of issues and merit reading too. One midwest
No comments:
Post a Comment